10,000bc
For amovie that's spectacular and lavish and full of special effects, I mean huge beasts and giant pyramids, with a cast of maybe thousands this is one of the most boring films I've seen recently (I've seen a few) and the twists at the end are not what you'd calll inspiring (in the least infact). So If you like a little romantic adventure or you like anything by the same director (the day after tommorow etc.) give iit a try. This is pretty predictable fare, I'd have given it a miss if I had scene it,, Irony huh.
Add a Comment
-
Comment by Bobby on April 1, 2008 at 1:34pm - Fair to say the mammoths were cool and think it's what was missing from 10,000 that 300 didn't have missing, which makes it a fairly bad comparison, but as I said the story was lacking something, and the twists at the end occured to fast making them slightly predictable and wholly unrealistic.
-
Comment by Ninja G on March 29, 2008 at 11:13am - and i dont see how this move resembled 300...at all.
-
Comment by Ninja G on March 29, 2008 at 11:11am
- it was ok. compared to Apocalypto it was decent. Apocalypto's "historical" presentation was waaaaay off. and in this movie the Mammoths were awesome >.<</body>
-
Comment by Bobby on March 20, 2008 at 2:25pm
- Exactly
-
Comment by Chiku on March 18, 2008 at 11:48pm
-
It was missing good storytelling. it was trying so hard to look and feel like 300 it frickin missed the part where you either enjoy the action, or enjoy the simple storyline.
and who the hell was that narrator?
-
Comment by Bobby on March 18, 2008 at 10:09am
- I suppose you think I'm being a bit unfair, I mean OK the film is graphically stunning and the scenery is pretty amazing, but with todays high standard of cinema fare I just thought it was missing something? it didn't have it?! Whatever it is, maybe I should ask the ninja?!
© 2009 Created by TheNinja
You need to be a member of Ask A Ninja Fans to add comments!
Join this social network